Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sommer v. Calcaterra

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 26, 1952No. Nos. 43095 and 43096PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeedy, J.

These cases were consolidated for the purpose of argument. They involve precisely the same issues, and so will be disposed of in a single opinion. They are original proceedings in prohibition to prevent the Board of Election Commissioners of the City of St. Louis from receiving declarations of candidates for the office of State Senator, and otherwise conducting the ensuing primary and general elections for such office in the senatorial districts into which the Board recently divided the city under an apportionment based on the 1950 decennial census. Relators sue as “citizens of the United…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Barrett v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. State Ex Rel. Brewen-Clark Syrup Co. v. Missouri Workmen's Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  3. State ex rel. McEntee v. BrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. State ex rel. West v. Justices of the County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  5. State ex rel. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n v. EbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Preisler v. DohertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Preisler v. DohertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. State v. HuntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. State ex rel. Holland v. MoranMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., Relators v. The Honorable Rex M. Burlison, and State ex rel. Imerys Talc America, Inc., Relator v. The Honorable Rex M. BurlisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API