Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., Relators v. The Honorable Rex M. Burlison, and State ex rel. Imerys Talc America, Inc., Relator v. The Honorable Rex M. Burlison

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 13, 2019No. SC96704, SC96710PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtW. Brent Powell, Judge

Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (collectively, "J&J"), and Imerys Talc America, Inc. ("Imerys" or, collectively, "Relators") seek writs of prohibition to prevent the circuit court from taking any further action other than to sever Michael Blaes' claims from the separate claims made by multiple plaintiffs in the underlying case pending in St. Louis City and to transfer Blaes' claims to St. Louis County, where Blaes' wife was first injured. This Court holds the circuit court abused its discretion in overruling Relators' motions to sever Blaes' claims and transfer them to St.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Country Chrysler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Harold S. McDaniel v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., Third Party v. Force Corporation, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. State Ex Rel. Allen v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  5. State ex rel. Strauser v. MartinezSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robert Ingham v. Johnson & JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API