Legal Opinion

Bank of Eudora v. Ross

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 4, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

T. E. Ray conveyed certain lands in Chicot County to S. A. Wilson by warranty deed, which recited notes executed by Wilson to Ray for unpaid purchase money. These notes were assigned by Ray to appellant, and Wilson subsequently conveyed the land to appellee Ross and one Van Ness, the grantees expressly assuming payment of said purchase money notes. The notes were not paid, and appellant instituted this action against Van Ness and appellee Ross to recover the amount of the notes and to enforce the vendor’s lien. At the commencement of the action appellant filed allegations and interrogatories…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCormick v. DaggettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. Smith v. SpinnenweberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  3. Smith v. Bank of HigdenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  4. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. McDermittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Helton v. HoweSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. ScreetonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. American Co. of Arkansas v. WheelerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. Haney v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Pfeiffer v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. New York Life Insurance Co. v. CherrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API