Legal Opinion

Helton v. Howe

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 28, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

Appellant instituted an action below against W. T. Howe, one .of the appellees, to recover damages on account of alleged wrongful act of said appellee, and, at the tinte of' the commencement of the action, appellant sued out a writ of garnishment against appellee, W. B. Worthen Company, a domestic 'corporation. Appellant gave bond required by the statute as a prerequisite for the issuance of garnishment' before judgment. Crawford & Moses’ Digest, § 4906. The garnishee answered, admitting that it held funds belonging to Howe, defendant in the action. The surety on the bond originally filed by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Billingsley v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Heard v. McCabeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  3. Armstrong v. LawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  4. Hatheway v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1859
  5. Laramore v. RadfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bank of Eudora v. RossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  2. Roth Tobacco Co. v. Layton Department StoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API