Legal Opinion

American Co. of Arkansas v. Wheeler

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 31, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). Counsel for the insurance companies claim that they were entitled to file a suit in the nature of a bill of interpleader in order to avoid a multiplicity of suits between the conflicting claimants to the fund 'agreed to be paid by the insurance companies on the fire insurance policies in question. They rely on the case of Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company v. Moore, 92 Ark. 446, 123 S. W. 233, where it was held that a bill in the nature of interpleader is one in which the complainant seeks certain relief of an equitable nature concerning the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Trumbull v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  2. Harris v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Shaul v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  4. Wilson v. OvertureSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  5. Woods v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Company of Arkansas v. WheelerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. Smith v. WheatSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Blackwell Oil & Gas Co. v. MadduxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. Goad v. GoadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  5. City of N.Y. Ins. Co. v. American Co. of Ark.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API