Legal Opinion

Security Fire & Indemnity Company v. Barnhardt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 11, 1966No. 611PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.

The right of the plaintiffs to sue Barnhardt is based upon their allegation that Kiser “released his interest” in the automobile to the plaintiff Finance; that it paid the deductible portion (but did not name the payee) “whereupon Security paid Finance $335.79 for damages to the said 1956 Chevrolet automobile.” For the insurer to become subrogated to any right of action which the insured may have against the third party, the payment must be to the insured under the policy. Finance was not an insured under the policy and the complaint does not allege any loss payable clause to it. Further, we…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burgess v. TrevathanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Powell v. . Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Rowland Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Service Fire Insurance v. Horton Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. The Royal Insurance Co v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. J & B Slurry Seal Co. v. Mid-South Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Rolling Fashion Mart, Inc. v. MainorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Ledbetter Bros. v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Capitol Fuels, Inc. v. Clark Equipment Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance v. StephensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API