Legal Opinion

Manner v. H.E.T., Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1987No. 52081PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMON, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Vernon and Edna Manner and John and Nancy Shipley, appeal a decree of the Circuit Court of the County of St. Charles granting a directed verdict in favor of H.E.T. Inc. and its trustees, Clifford Heitgerd, Donald Ell, and Bernard Ter-brock (hereinafter referred to as defendants).

On appeal, plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in: (1) entertaining defendants’ oral motion in limine the morning of trial; (2) sustaining defendants’ oral motion in limine and refusing plaintiffs’ oral motion for leave to amend the September 3, 1975 date in their original petition…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vandever v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Annin v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Barnett v. M & G GAS CO.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Clayton Brokerage Co. of St. Louis, Inc. v. LowranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Brummit v. O'Fallon Bros. Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Steenrod v. Klipsch Hauling Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Missouri Farmers Ass'n v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Littles v. CumminsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Holt v. HoltMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Evans v. BoyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API