Legal Opinion

Poppitz v. Rognes

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 26, 1899No. Nos. 11,548—(156)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Jackson county, Quinn, J., denying a motion for appointment of a receiver of defendant’s nonexempt property.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This appeal is from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of a receiver in proceedings supplementary to execution.

The plaintiff obtained a judgment against the defendant for some $68, and caused to be issued thereon an execution, which was returned unsatisfied three days after it was issued. The defendant was then brought up under an order of court for examination concerning his property. It appeared from his examination that he was cropping 200 acres of land, belonging to one Lammers, under a “farm contract,” of substantially the kind in common use in this state, which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Flint v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  2. Bean v. HeronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edmonston v. SiskCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  2. Wilkins v. CoreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Ginsberg v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Minneapolis Savings & Loan Ass'n v. YoltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API