Legal Opinion
Schmid v. Ballard
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 6, 1928No. Nos. 26,475, 26,525PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action by the plaintiffs, minority stockholders of the defendant Twin City Securities Company, against Homer D. Ballard and others, including the Twin City Securities Company, for an accounting and for specific and general relief. A receiver of the Twin City company was appointed ex parte. The company appeals from the order of appointment of date February 17, 1927, and from an order of July 10, 1927, denying its motion to vacate the earlier order. The two appeals were consolidated and heard together.
On February 14, 1927, the summons in the action was given the sheriff for service and was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miner v. Belle Isle Ice Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Green v. National Advertising & Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Lowell v. DoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Pust v. HoltzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Nielsen v. HealdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Singer v. Allied Factors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Goff v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Straus v. StrausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Faber v. EnkemaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.