McGeary v. Huff
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 43, April T., 1906, by defendant, from order of O. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Nov. T., 1903, No. 41, making absolute rule for judgment against garnishee in ease of George H. McGeary v. Charles C. Huff. Attachment execution against a trust company. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was in entering judgment against the garnishee.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bv
Head, J.,
The appellee, having obtained a judgment against the appellant, issued an attachment execution thereon with notice to the Monongahela Trust Company of Homestead as garnishee. The defendant being a resident of the county in which the writ issued, it was served on him, as well as on the garnishee, and both appeared.
To the interrogatories filed by the plaintiff, the garnishee originally answered admitting in its hands the sum of $610.14 belonging to the defendant. This admission was plain, clear, and without any qualification, and would have undoubtedly supported a judgment in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lancaster County Bank v. GrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
- Rozelle v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Allegheny Savings Bank v. MeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Importers & Traders National Bank v. LyonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Bell v. Philadelphia Binding & Mailing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ruehl v. Maxwell Steel Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Wanamaker & Brown v. MuldoonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Landis Machine Co. v. D'Amico, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1930
- Walls v. Gaines, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1940