Bell v. Philadelphia Binding & Mailing Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 84, Oct. T., 1898, by garnishee, from judgment of O. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1897, No. 659, on garnishee’s answers. Opinion by W. D. Pobteb, J. Rule for judgment on garnishee’s answer. Before the court in banc. The following answers were filed by the garnishee to plaintiff’s interrogatories: In answer to the first interrogatory, the garnishee says that it does know the defendant.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 84, Oct. T., 1898, by garnishee, from judgment of O. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1897, No. 659, on garnishee’s answers. Opinion by W. D. Pobteb, J. Rule for judgment on garnishee’s answer. Before the court in banc. The following answers were filed by the garnishee to plaintiff’s interrogatories: In answer to the first interrogatory, the garnishee says that it does know the defendant. In answer to the second interrogatory, the garnishee says that it has had business transactions with the defendant; that at the time of the service of the writ of attachment, there was due to the…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bx
W. D. Portbb, J.,
The plaintiff, having obtained judgment against the defendant, an execution attachment was issued and the Hubbard Publishing Company summoned as garnishee. Interrogatories and a rule to answer were duly served, whereupon the garnishee filed an answer admitting, (1) an absolute indebtedness to the defendant in the sum of $110.08, and (2) that it had, prior to service of the attachment, given to the defendant three promissory notes; one for $280.34, at four months, dated September 24, 1897; another for $238.73, at four months, dated October 8,1897; and another for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lancaster County Bank v. GrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
- McCallum v. MorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Fulweiler v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851
- Hagy v. HardinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Kieffer v. EhlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Joseph Melnick Building & Loan Ass'n v. MelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- McGeary v. HuffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Holliday v. PotterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Landis Machine Co. v. D'Amico, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1930