Legal Opinion

Importers & Traders National Bank v. Lyons

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1900No. Appeal, No. 351PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 351, Jan. T., 1899, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., March T., 1899, No. 760, on answer to interrogatories in case of Importers and Traders National Bank of New York v. J. Harry Lyons, defendant, and Samuel Simpson, individually, and trading as Samuel Simpson & Co., garnishee and appellant. Attachment execution. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was in entering judgment against the garnishee.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Brown,

This is an appeal by a garnishee, who complains that, if the judgment entered -against him in the court below be allowed to stand, he may be compelled to -pay the amount of the same to another, after having paid it to'the attaching creditor. The judgment entered against him was upon his answers .to interrogatories filed by the appellee. The latter had obtained judgment against J. Harry Lyons, and an attachment execution was issued upon it, in which the appellant was named as garnishee. Fifty-oné interrogatories were filed and among the answers to them is the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lancaster County Bank v. GrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
  2. Knerr v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  3. Conshohocken Tube Co. v. Iron Car Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rankin v. CulverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Lyons v. Importers' & Traders' National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Stern & Co. v. HarrodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. McGeary v. HuffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Northampton Brewery Corp. v. LandeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API