Heinrich v. City of Detroit
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtM. F. Cavanagh, P.J.
Plaintiff, Edgar William Heinrich, appeals as of right from the trial court’s finding of no cause of action in favor of codefendants City of Detroit and Detroit Board of Education.
Plaintiff brought an action in inverse condemnation against defendants, alleging that various individual and joint acts by the defendants in the management of an urban renewal project affected his property so adversely as to amount to a de facto taking without just compensation.
Plaintiff owned a building on Canfield in the City of Detroit. In late 1962, the city approved a massive urban renewal plan, entitled,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Conroy-Prugh Glass Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Foster v. City of Detroit, MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
- Washington Market Enterprises, Inc. v. City of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- In Re Urban Renewal, Elmwood Park ProjectMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Pearsall v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bigelow v. Michigan Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Macene v. MJW, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Marilyn Froling Revocable Living Trust v. Bloomfield Hills Country ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Hart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Robert Curto, Individually and D/B/A Curto's Auto Service v. City of Harper Woods, an Incorporated MunicipalityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.