Legal Opinion
Bigelow v. Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 14, 1992No. 90-1091PublishedCited by 128 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
This case results from complications caused by the federal government’s attempt to restore aboriginal fishing rights to-Michigan Indians. A group of commercial fishermen challenged the State of Michigan’s support of a plan, approved by a federal court, by which Indians were given exclusive rights to fish in certain Michigan waters. The district court granted the defendants’ motions for summary judgment and dismissal, and the plaintiffs appeal to this court. We dismiss this case because no federal issues are ripe for review.
I
In 1973, the United States brought suit asking…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Crist v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Nasierowski Brothers Investment Company v. City of Sterling HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Bundo v. City of Walled LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by128 opinions
- Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Musson Theatrical, Inc., and Modernage Photo Service, Inc., for Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Bowlby v. City of Aberdeen, Miss.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Hidden Oaks Limited, Hidden Oaks Limited, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The City of Austin, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Gary Arnett v. Gary T. Myers, Executive Director of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.