Legal Opinion

In Re Urban Renewal, Elmwood Park Project

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1965No. Calendar No. 37, Docket No. 50,210PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

376 Mich. 311 (1965)

136 N.W.2d 896

In re URBAN RENEWAL, ELMWOOD PARK PROJECT.

CITY OF DETROIT

v.

CASSESE.

Calendar No. 37, Docket No. 50,210.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided October 4, 1965.

Rehearing denied December 7, 1965.

Robert Reese, Corporation Counsel, Edward M. Welch, Ronald R. Sogge, and Geraldine B. Ford, Assistant Corporation Counsel, for plaintiff.

Irving B. Ackerman, for defendant.

ADAMS, J.

On June 7, 1950, form letters advising that condemnation was about to be started were sent by the city of Detroit to defendant, the owner of two properties, and to all other persons having an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Toledo, Ann Arbor & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. DunlapMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Long v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Cleveland v. CarcioneOhio Court of Appeals · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Westgate, Ltd. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Thomas E. Foster and Georgia Lee Foster, and Cross-Appellants v. City of Detroit, Michigan, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  4. Buckeye Union Fire Insurance v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Textron, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API