Legal Opinion

Amalgamated Transit Union v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1985No. Docket No. 81130PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The City of Detroit appeals as of right from an order of the Michigan Employment Relations Commission. The city had entered into a contract agreement with the Amalgamated Transit Union. The union represents bus drivers that work for the city. Their contract had provided for a two-year wage freeze, from July 1, 1981, to June 30, 1983. On July 1, 1983, a six percent wage increase was to be given to employees. When that date arrived the city unilaterally announced that the increase would not be awarded. The union instituted an unfair labor practice charge and alleged that the city had violated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Food Store Employees Union, Local 347Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. LOCAL 1383 v. City of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. SellersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Capac Bus Drivers Ass'n v. Capac Community Schools Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Robertson v. LOCAL DIV. 26, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNIONMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goolsby v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Hunter v. Wayne-Westland Community School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Hunter v. Wayne-Westland Community School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Hunter v. Wayne-Westland Community School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API