Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hunter v. Wayne-Westland Community School District

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1989No. Docket 100782, 100879Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMichael J. Kelly, P.J.

I concur in the finding that the wwea breached its duty of fair representation with regards to Hunter.

I disagree with the majority’s finding that the pera authorizes merc to award attorney fees to the prevailing party. Nowhere in the pera is there any language specifically providing for the recovery of attorney fees. Section 16(b) of the pera, MCL 423.216(b); MSA 17.455(16)(b), does give merc the power "to take such affirmative action including reinstatement of employees with or without back pay, as will effectuate the policies of this act.” I believe that the ambiguous phrase "as will…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Amalgamated Transit Union v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API