National Labor Relations Board v. Food Store Employees Union, Local 347
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
The National Labor Relations Board refused to include, in a cease-and-desist order against Heck’s Inc., a provision sought by respondent union, as charging party, that Heck’s reimburse respondent’s litigation ex penses and excess organizational costs incurred as a result of Heck’s unlawful conduct. The Board’s stated reason was that “it would not on balance effectuate the policies of the [National Labor Relations] Act to require reimbursement with respect to such costs in the circumstances here.” Heck’s Inc., 191 N. L. R. B. 886, 889 (1971). Respondent prevailed, however, in enforcement and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by216 opinions
- Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Federal Communications Commission v. National Citizens Committee for BroadcastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- South Prairie Construction Co. v. Local No. 627, International Union of Operating EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bennie Lenard, Cross-Appellant v. Robert Argento & Joseph Sansone v. Village of Melrose ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Coalition for Government Procurement v. Federal Prison Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
211 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.