Legal Opinion

d'Abrera v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 15, 2007No. Nos. 06-427C, 07-365CPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

These cases raise claims of copyright infringement under 28 U.S.C. § 1498(b). On May 10, 2006, Bernard d’Abrera and Hill House Publishers Pty Ltd. (“Hill House”) filed suit against Stephen Kinyon and the Smithsonian Institution in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging violations by both defendants of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and direct copyright infringement by Mr. Kinyon of plaintiffs’ works in contravention of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq. Complaint, d’Abrera v. Smithsonian Institution, No.…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Society of the Holy Transfiguration Monastery, Inc. v. Archbishop Gregory of DenverCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  2. Prati v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Mastrolia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Passamaquoddy Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. Ak-Chin Indian Community v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API