Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Triplett v. Ross

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2006No. 2006-0742PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an action for a writ of prohibition to prevent a municipal court and its judge and clerk from ordering attorneys who seek court appointments to complete and return a declaration specified by the Ohio Patriot Act to certify that they do not provide material assistance to a terrorist organization. Because the Ohio Patriot Act does not require that the declaration be completed when the attorney makes less than $100,000 annually from these appointments, we grant the writ in part.

{¶ 2} On December 14, 2005, the General Assembly enacted the Ohio Patriot Act, Am.Sub.S.B. No. 9 (“S.B.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Arnold v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Johnson v. Microsoft Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State ex rel. Enyart v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State ex rel. BSW Development Group v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Klein v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. The State Ex Rel. Ford v. Ruehlman, JudgeOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Roberts v. RMB Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Wilson v. Ac S, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Cincinnati City School District Board of Education v. State Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State Ex Rel. Roberts v. WinklerOhio Court of Appeals · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API