Legal Opinion

Russell v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 2011No. 07-CF-659PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAGNER, Senior Judge:

Appellant, Robert A. Russell, appeals from his convictions of armed carjacking, armed robbery, possession of a firearm during commission of a crime of violence (PFCV), unauthorized use of a motor vehicle (UUV), and theft. 1 The sole issue raised by his appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in precluding appellant from presenting expert testimony concerning the reliability and accuracy of eyewitness testimony. Concluding that more recent developments in the scientific community and in our case law require more in-depth consideration of the factors…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Salen v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. People v. LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Dyas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Heath v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. In re L.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Jeremiah Gray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Minor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API