Legal Opinion
Jeremiah Gray v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 7, 2013No. 10-CF-1466PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Associate Judge:
A jury found appellant Jeremiah Gray guilty of two counts of armed robbery and two counts of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence (“PFCV”). On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court (1) abused its discretion when it precluded him from presenting expert testimony about factors that affect the reliability of eyewitness identifications, and (2) abused its discretion in responding to a juror note about aiding and abetting liability by doing no more than re-reading in their entirety the aiding and abetting instructions the jury had already heard…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Dyas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- United States v. Miguel Nunez (88-2089) and Ernesto Rodriguez (88-2090)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Donell R. Washington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Ellswsorth Colbert v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- MICHAEL SANDERS v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Bost v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Darren Cheeks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.