Phan v. Presrite Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Nahra, Chief Justice.
Appellant, Quang Phan, was injured when he was operating a power press in the course of his employment with Presrite, Inc. Appellant sued his employer and others, including the manufacturer of the foot switch used to activate the press, Linemaster Switch Corporation. Appellant appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Linemaster Switch, appellee. Claims against all other defendants have been settled and dismissed.
Quang Phan stated in deposition that on December 14, 1989, a part became stuck inside the power press he was operating. Quang attempted to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Seley v. G. D. Searle & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- Crislip v. TCH Liquidating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Keister v. Park Centre LanesOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Freas v. Prater Construction Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mohney v. USA Hockey, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Poluse v. City of YoungstownOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Vermett v. Fred Christen Sons CompanyOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- McConnell v. Cosco, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Boyd v. Lincoln Electric Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.