McConnell v. Cosco, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
KEMP, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Summary Judgment Motion. For the following reasons, Defendants’ Summary Judgment Motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiffs’ manufacturing defect claim, Mrs. McConnell’s back injury claim, and Plaintiffs’ punitive damages claim as to Defendant Penn Traffic Company; Defendants’ Summary Judgment Motion is DENIED in all other respects.
II. Facts
Because this matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Summary Judgment Motion, the Court views the facts in the light most favorable to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- James F. BARNHART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PICKREL, SCHAEFFER & EBELING COMPANY, L.P.A., Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Indiana Insurance v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Mohney v. USA Hockey, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Lykins v. Fun Spot TrampolinesOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Boyd v. Lincoln Electric Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Rheinfrank v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.