Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Davis

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided December 30, 1997No. NMCM 96 00585PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOMBROSKI, Chief Judge:

We have examined the record of trial, the 13 assignments of error,1 and the Govern-*709merit’s response thereto, and we have considered the points raised in the oral argument of this case. We conclude that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed. We comment on the key issues in the case.

Background

The appellant, a Navy lieutenant commander, was tried on various dates in July, August, and September 1995 before a general court-martial composed of officer members.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  3. United States v. GinnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  4. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  2. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  3. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  4. United States v. YoungArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  5. United States v. DavisUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API