Legal Opinion

People v. Daniels

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 2003No. B158974PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERKEN, J.

Here we hold that conduct credits against a defendant’s prison sentence attributable to a jail term served as a condition of probation are limited by Penal Code section 2933.1, subdivision (c) (section 2933.1(c)). Frank Daniels was convicted of residential burglary and placed on probation. When probation was revoked and Daniels was sentenced to state prison, the trial court limited conduct credits against his prison sentence to 15 percent of his actual custody time. (§ 2933.1(c).) Daniels contends that conduct credits he was awarded for time spent in local custody as a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. BuckhalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. People v. Van BurenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Arevalo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. People v. CurryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. P. v. Fahey CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. People v. Vidor CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API