Legal Opinion

Peck v. Stafford Flour Mills Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 13, 1923No. 6165PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, District Judge.

This is an action brought by defendant in error (plaintiff below) to recover damages for breach of contract. Plaintiff claimed that it had sold flour to defendant, and that he had refused to give instructions and specifications for shipment of the same, as agreed in the contract. The defense originally set up in the answer was that the contract had been canceled by mutual agreement. On the trial, defendant was allowed by the court to amend the answer by *44setting up as an additional defense that the contract was unilateral. At the close of the evidence the court instructed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ross v. TaborCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Canal Co. v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Marin Water & Power Co. v. Town of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Teal v. BilbySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Fricke v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Molyneux v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Griffin v. Oklahoma Natural Gas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  3. West River Equipment Co. v. Holzworth Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Birmingham v. BartelsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
  5. Atkinson v. New Britain MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API