State v. Riddle
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
In this criminal case, we are asked to decide whether a defendant may prevent an accident reconstruction expert, whom the defense originally had hired to investigate the accident on which the criminal charges were based, from testifying for the state about an opinion that the expert formed while in the defendant’s employ. We hold that a privilege to prevent such an expert from testifying altogether cannot be based solely on the fact that the state offers the expert testimony against the party that originally employed the expert. On the specific facts before us, we affirm the ruling of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. CarlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Meyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Holt v. McCastlainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Klamath County School District v. TeameyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Brown v. Guard Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.