Legal Opinion

Azer v. Myers

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1990No. 12578, 12629 to 12634PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*508OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HAYASHI, J.

We granted certiorari to two of the parties in order to address two of the issues raised in connection with the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) opinion in Azer v. Myers [published as SGM Partners v. The Profit Co.], 8 Haw. App. 86,_P.2d_(1990). Based on the reasons set forth below, we reverse in part and affirm in part.

I

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The pertinent facts for purposes of this opinion arc as follows.

In May 1983, SGM Partners (SGM), the original owner and lessor of the subject property, entered into a lease with The Profit Co., Ltd. (Profit) for certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Azer v. MyersHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Shannon v. WaterhouseHawaii Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Kiewit Eastern Co., Inc. v. L & R Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Pancakes of Hawaii, Inc. v. Pomare Properties Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Schmidt v. Board of Directors of the Ass'n of Apartment OwnersHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Ditto v. McCurdyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API