Legal Opinion

Ceasco, Inc. v. Byrom

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 15, 2002No. 2010541PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAWLEY, Judge.

I.Facts and Procedural History

Richard Byrom (“the worker”) was employed by Ceasco, Inc., d/b/a Skill Lube (“the company”), as a service manager at an automobile service and repair store operated by the company in Madison. As a part of his job, the worker made telephone calls to customers, vendors, employees, and supervisors. The worker was responsible for ordering parts, answering questions regarding repairs, giving price quotations, and checking on large accounts and outstanding accounts. Approximately 30% of the worker’s day was spent on the telephone, performing these duties.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. City of Tuscaloosa v. HowardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  5. Pow v. Southern Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ByromSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Brown v. PattonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  3. Ceasco, Inc. v. ByromSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Ex Parte ByromSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API