Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Byrom

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 2, 2004No. 1021113Published

1Opinion of the Court

895 So.2d 942 (2004)

Ex parte Richard BYROM. (In re Ceasco, Inc., d/b/a Skill Lube v. Richard Byrom).

1021113.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 2, 2004.

Rehearing Denied May 28, 2004.

Michael K. Timberlake of Siniard, Timberlake & League, P.C., Huntsville, for petitioner.

James L. Stirling, Jr., Birmingham, for respondent.

JOHNSTONE, Justice.

Richard Byrom sued his former employer Ceasco, Inc., d/b/a Skill Lube, for workers' compensation benefits for injuries he suffered from an on-the-job lightning strike. After trial on oral testimony and written exhibits, the trial court entered an order which…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Ex Parte Toyota Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  4. Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Alabama Textile Products Corporation v. GranthamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API