Legal Opinion
Hetherington v. McHale
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 2, 1973No. Nos. 555 C.D. 1973, 559 C.D. 1973 and 560 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Bowman,
Understandably perplexed as to the appropriate form of action to be employed in this bizarre case, six of seventeen persons appointed to a statutorily created committee charged with administering certain agricultural research programs financed by the Pennsylvania Fair Fund brought actions in equity (No. 560 C.D. 1973), in quo warranto (No. 559 C.D. 1973) and in mandamus (No. 555 C.D. 1973), seeking to enjoin meetings of or action by the committee unless plaintiffs participate therein; seeking judicial determination that plaintiffs are proper members of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Commonwealth ex rel. McClain v. LockeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
- Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Daly v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Wheeler v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Minerd v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hetherington v. McHALESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Jim Wayne in His Official Capacity as State Representative v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Office of the Governor Matthew Bevin in His Official Capacity as GovernorKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
- Gilman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Nicolette v. CarusoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Sweet v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.