Lautenschlager v. Hamburg
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
Was there sufficient credible evidence to support the jury’s apportionment of negligence
The jury found both parties to be causally negligent and apportioned 10 percent to the plaintiff and 90 percent to the defendant. The plaintiff, the appellant in this court, takes the position that there is no credible evidence to support the jury’s verdict finding her negligent.
We have taken the position that when a verdict of a jury is attacked, it will be sustained if there is any credible evidence under any reasonable view to sustain it. This is particularly true where, as here, the apportionment has…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ballard v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Springen v. Ager Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Ernst v. GreenwaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Moritz v. Allied American Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Seitz v. SeitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Jagmin v. Simonds Abrasive Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Leitinger v. DBart, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Lemberger v. Koehring Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- McCrossen v. Nekoosa Edwards Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Nolden v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.