Legal Opinion

Lautenschlager v. Hamburg

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1969No. 175PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

Was there sufficient credible evidence to support the jury’s apportionment of negligence

The jury found both parties to be causally negligent and apportioned 10 percent to the plaintiff and 90 percent to the defendant. The plaintiff, the appellant in this court, takes the position that there is no credible evidence to support the jury’s verdict finding her negligent.

We have taken the position that when a verdict of a jury is attacked, it will be sustained if there is any credible evidence under any reasonable view to sustain it. This is particularly true where, as here, the apportionment has…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ballard v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Springen v. Ager Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Ernst v. GreenwaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Moritz v. Allied American Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Seitz v. SeitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Jagmin v. Simonds Abrasive Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Leitinger v. DBart, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Lemberger v. Koehring Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. McCrossen v. Nekoosa Edwards Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Nolden v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API