Lemberger v. Koehring Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffeenan, J.
The defendant Koehring, in urging that the judgment be sustained, argues that there is no evidence that the wear block struck Lemberger. It is true that no one could testify that they saw the 16 pound piece of maple actually strike him. However, the evidence is sufficient to show that Lemberger was struck by this piece of wood. The construction foreman stated that, immediately after Lemberger’s injury, the wear block was lying nearby and there was nothing else that could *215have struck him. The crane operator said that just before the accident happened he saw something fall in front of him that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kink v. CombsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- City of Franklin v. Badger Ford Truck Sales, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Rausch v. BuisseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Rabata v. DohnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Menge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Martindale v. RippWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Chart Ex Rel. Sommer v. General Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. ArchboldNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Kuhlman, Inc. v. G. Heileman Brew. Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Leahy Ex Rel. Heft v. Kenosha Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.