Cavin's, Inc. v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
In the policy sued upon, defendant Insurance Company did not agree to “pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages, . . . arising out of . . . malicious prosecution.” Had the policy read in that fashion, plaintiff would be entitled to prevail. Such an agreement, however, can be read into the policy only by ignoring the words omitted from the foregoing quoted portion of the policy and by ignoring as well other clearly expressed policy provisions. This, we have no right to do.
What the policy did provide was that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Floars v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Walsh v. United Insurance Company of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Overnite Transportation Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & HelpersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Duke v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
3Cited by20 opinions
- Brown v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Mazza v. Medical Mut. Ins. Co. of NCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Schnuck Markets, Inc. v. Transamerica Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Providence Washington Insurance Co. v. City of ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Shugar v. GuillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.