Legal Opinion

Lindell v. Oak Park Coop. Creamery

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 10, 1985No. C9-84-1768PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Justice.

Did the employer’s workers’ compensation insurer properly discontinue payment of dependency compensation for the benefit of the deceased employee’s minor children following the remarriage of their mother, his surviving spouse, on June 11, 1983? Although the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) affirmed the determination of the compensation judge that the discontinuance was authorized by Minn. Stat. § 176.111, subd. 21 (1982), we have concluded that the children remained entitled to benefits pursuant to the construction we gave section 176.111, subds. 21 and 10, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. List and Clark Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  2. Meils v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Lemke v. Knudsen Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Redland v. Nelson's Quality Eggs, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Saukkola v. Airtex IndustriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schatz v. Interfaith Care CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Alcozer v. North Country Food BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Ruter v. Minnesota Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Rice ex rel. Rice v. Penny's Supermarkets & Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Alcozer v. North Country Food BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API