Legal Opinion

Saukkola v. Airtex Industries

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 31, 1981No. 81-125PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals wherein certain issues concerning the coordination of social security and workers’ compensation benefits between a widow and a child dependent and benefits payable to a child after the remarriage of a surviving spouse were decided. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The following statement of facts by the relator is uncontested:

On March 14, 1977 Paul B. Saukkola was employed by Airtex Industries as a materials handler, and his wage for purposes of the Minnesota workers’ compensation law was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lemke v. Knudsen Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Redland v. Nelson's Quality Eggs, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Radisson Hotel v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Johnson v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Johnson v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lindell v. Oak Park Coop. CreamerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Rice ex rel. Rice v. Penny's Supermarkets & Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API