Saukkola v. Airtex Industries
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals wherein certain issues concerning the coordination of social security and workers’ compensation benefits between a widow and a child dependent and benefits payable to a child after the remarriage of a surviving spouse were decided. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The following statement of facts by the relator is uncontested:
On March 14, 1977 Paul B. Saukkola was employed by Airtex Industries as a materials handler, and his wage for purposes of the Minnesota workers’ compensation law was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lemke v. Knudsen Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Redland v. Nelson's Quality Eggs, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State ex rel. Radisson Hotel v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Johnson v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Johnson v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lindell v. Oak Park Coop. CreamerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Rice ex rel. Rice v. Penny's Supermarkets & Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985