Vaughn v. DeKreek
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRAY, J. *
Plaintiff appeals from judgment after jury verdict in favor of defendants in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.
Questions Presented
1. Is the jury’s finding that plaintiff, who was unlicensed, was acting as a contractor supported by the evidence?
2. Is the action moot because of satisfaction of the judgment?
Record
Plaintiff is a retail nurseryman, doing business at Woodland under the name of Vaunlanda Gardens Nursery, having been such since 1932. He has a retail sales tax license but does not have a contractor’s license.
Defendants are homeowners who wanted their residence…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Latipac, Inc. v. Superior Court of Marin CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Reitano v. YankwichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Hayes v. . NourseNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Warner Bros. Co. v. FreudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Hardin v. ElvitskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walter E. Heller Western, Inc. v. Tecrim Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Hurst v. Buczek Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012