Centro Tepeyac v. Montgomery County
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:
Centro Tepeyac, a Montgomery County nonprofit corporation that provides pregnancy services but does not refer for or provide abortions, commenced this action against Montgomery County, Maryland, the Montgomery County Council, the Montgomery County Department of Health and Human Services, and Marc Hansen, the acting County Counsel (collectively, “Montgomery County” or “the County”), challenging the constitutionality of Montgomery County Resolution No. 16-1252. In its complaint, it contended that in compelling speech, the resolution violates its free speech rights…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Riley v. National Federation of Blind of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- City of Ladue v. GilleoSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Florida Star v. B. J. F.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Thompson v. Western States Medical CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Centro Tepeyac v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Evergreen Ass'n v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Centro Tepeyac v. Montgomery CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- A Woman's Friend Pregnancy Resource Clinic v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.