Legal Opinion
Centro Tepeyac v. Montgomery County
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 7, 2014No. Civil Action No. DKC 10-1259PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge.
Presently pending and ready for resolution in this action arising under the First and Fourteenth Amendments are the motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Centro Tepeyac (“Centro Tepeyac”) (ECF No. 68) and the cross-motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Montgomery County and Montgomery County Council (collectively, “the County”) (ECF No. 70). The issues are fully *748briefed and the court now rules, no hearing being deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6. For the reasons that follow, the Plaintiffs motion will be granted in part…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Blanch v. Chubb & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Rivero v. Montgomery CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Christ v. Town of Ocean CityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- Eric Marcado-Julio v. Todd Blanche, U.S. Attorney General, et al.District Court, S.D. California · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.