Legal Opinion

Container Co. v. Carpenter Container Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided April 21, 1949No. Civ. A. No. 1053PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODNEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff and the additional defendant have moved under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 42(b), 28 U.S.C.A., for an order directing a separate trial of the two claims asserted in the defendant’s counterclaim. The motion is supported by two affidavits, and no affidavits in opposition have been filed.

Numerous motions have been presented in this action previous to the motion now under consideration, but they have all been disposed of either by agreement between the parties or' by the court. See Container Co. v. Carpenter Container Corp., D.C.Del. 1948, 8 F.R.D. 208.

Th…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lyophile-Cryochem Corp. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1947
  2. Society of European Stage Authors & Composers, Inc. v. WCAU Broadcasting Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Container Co. v. Carpenter Container Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
  4. United States v. EmeryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  5. Cofax Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hoyt, Inc. v. Born (In Re Born)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1981
  2. Fischer & Porter Co. v. Sheffield Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
  3. Value Line Fund, Inc. v. MarcusDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1952
  5. Components, Inc. v. Western Electric CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API