Legal Opinion

Value Line Fund, Inc. v. Marcus

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 8, 1958PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERLANDS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs seek rescission, restitution and damages under common law and under the Securities Act of 1933 [15 U.S. C.A. section 77a et seq.], with respect to a $3,247,000 purchase by plaintiffs of 191,000 shares of the common stock of United States Hoffman Machinery Corporation (called “Hoffman” herein) from the defendant Marcus, through the defendant Van Alstyne, Noel & Co. The sale was negotiated in behalf of the plaintiffs by Arnold Bernhard, president of plaintiffs, and Arnold Bernhard & Co., Inc., plaintiffs’ investment manager and adviser.

Plaintiffs allege inter…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United Artists Corporation v. Masterpiece Productions, Inc., and Robert S. Benjamin, Arthur B. Krim, Seymour M. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  2. Collins v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  3. Container Co. v. Carpenter Container Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
  4. Kuhn v. Yellow Transit Freight Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1952
  5. General Casualty Co. of America v. FedoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Akzona Inc. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984
  2. Reed v. StreibWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Pearl Brewing Co. v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1976
  4. Kelly v. GreerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  5. General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Jefferson Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API