Cofax Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HTJLBERT, District Judge.
Defendant moves, pursuant to Rule 42 (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for the entry of an order for a separate trial of the issue of res adjudicata raised by the pleadings in the above action.
Defendant has heretofore moved for summary judgment before Judge Coxe, of this court, 79 F.Supp. 842, who, in an opinion dated July 25, 1947, denied the motion. At the outset, it is contended by the plaintiff that the present motion is, in effect, an attempt to relitigate the question of res adjudicata, which plaintiff asserts was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. International Plastic Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Pax Plastics Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1946
- Cofax Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1947
3Cited by1 opinion
- Container Co. v. Carpenter Container Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949