Legal Opinion

Burns v. Gill

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided July 8, 1970No. Civ. 2308PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION ON THE LEGISLATIVE REAPPORTIONMENT PROVISIONS OF THE 1968 CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

PENCE, District Judge.

The prior history of Hawaii’s reapportionment problems is fully set forth in Holt v. Richardson, 238 F.Supp. 468 (D.Hawaii 1965), and Id., 240 F.Supp. 724 (D.Hawaii 1965), and the same case, sub nom. Burns v. Richardson, 384 U.S. 73, 86 S.Ct. 1286, 16 L.Ed.2d 376 (1966).

Pursuant to the April 25, 1966 Order of Remand of the Supreme Court, this three-judge court on August 17, 1966, ordered the State of Hawaii to take the steps necessary to formulate and enact a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Burns v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Hadley v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Roman v. SincockSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Calderon v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Travis v. KingDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1982
  3. In re 1983 Legislative Apportionment of House, Senate, and Congressional DistrictsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. Boyer v. GardnerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1982
  5. Blair v. AriyoshiHawaii Supreme Court · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API