Legal Opinion

Michael R. Monkelis v. Mobay Chemical

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 2, 1987No. 87-3095PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GIBBONS, Chief Judge:

Michael R. Monkelis appeals from a summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Mobay Chemical. His complaint alleges federal jurisdiction based on alleged violations of 29 U.S.C. § 1140, and pendent state law claims. The district court, applying a borrowed six year state law statute of limitations, concluded that Monkelis’ federal law claim was time barred, and declined to exercise pendent jurisdiction over the state law claims.

Monkelis contends the trial court erred in holding that his complaint was untimely. The last day of his employment was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Emra Joseph Bonham v. Dresser Industries, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  3. Gregory Lawson v. Conyers Chrysler, Plymouth, and Dodge Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. Bledsoe v. Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Michael R. Monkelis v. Mobay ChemicalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. Gregorovich v. E.I. Du Pont De NemoursDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  4. Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. Weber (In Re Weber)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Pennsylvania Footwear Corp. v. Midlantic Bank, N.A. (In re Pennsylvania Footwear Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API