Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Footwear Corp. v. Midlantic Bank, N.A. (In re Pennsylvania Footwear Corp.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 14, 1996No. Bankruptcy No. 95-19785DAS; Adv. No. 96-0342DASPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID A. SCHOLL, Chief Bankruptcy Judge.

A INTRODUCTION

Presently before this court is a motion for summary judgment (“the Motion”) of MID-LANTIC BANK, N.A. (“the Movant”) in its favor as to the Complaint for Money (“the Complaint”) brought against the Movant in the above-captioned adversary proceeding, (“the Proceeding”) in which PENNSYLVANIA FOOTWEAR CORPORATION (“the Debtor”) and “ARTHUR P. LIEBERSOHN, As Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Trustee” (“the Trustee”), are the Plaintiffs.

The Complaint alleges the Movant’s failure to have certain real estate owned by the Debtor removed from a February…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Ness v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pennsylvania Footwear Corp. v. Midlantic Bank, N.A. (In Re Pennsylvania Footwear Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API