Legal Opinion

Davis v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 19, 1893PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is an action for personal injuries. The plaintiff was run down by a train while he was repairing a track for the defendant, doing work which required him to bend over. He was facing north, and the trains came from the south, so that, as he contended, he had to rely on others to warn him of their approach. It was the duty of the foreman of his gang, or section boss, as he was called, to warn him. The plaintiff went to trial on two counts under the employer’s liability act, St. 1887, c. 270, the second count alleging that the foreman, being a person intrusted with and exercising…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Menard v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Hayes v. Inhabitants of Hyde ParkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Malcolm v. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  5. Steffe v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. American Rolling Mill Co. v. HullingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. GattaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1913
  4. Morris v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  5. Caron v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API