Legal Opinion

Steffe v. Old Colony Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 7, 1892PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The defendant demurred to the declaration, and in support of the demurrer contends that the first count is defective because it does not state in what the alleged negligence of the brakeman Thompson consisted, or in what way his alleged incompetence caused the injury complained of. The allegations on this point, in substance, are that by reason of the negligence *263and incompetence of Thompson, then in the defendant’s employ as a brakeman, and having charge or control of a train at that time moving, etc., the plaintiff was caught between two moving trains, and was hurt. The above ground of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Train v. Boston Disinfecting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  2. Windram v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Lawless v. Connecticut River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  4. Taylor v. Inhabitants of WoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  5. Commonwealth v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Gabriel v. BorowyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. Davis v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  4. York Harbor Village Corp. v. LibbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928
  5. Cohen & Powell, Inc. v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1940

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API