Legal Opinion

American Rolling Mill Co. v. Hullinger

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1903No. 20,100PublishedCited by 37 opinions

From Delaware Circuit Court; J. G. Leffler, Judge. Action by James H. Hullinger against the American Rolling Mill Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGillett, J.

— Suit for personal injury, instituted by appellee against appellant. The complaint of the former .seeks to charge appellant with negligence because of the omission of its master mechanic, and the first question is whether it appears from the complaint that said master mechanic was not a co-servant, but was a person for whose acts the appellant was responsible. It is charged in said pleading not only that said master mechanic had full charge of the work at which appellee was engaged at the time of his injury, but that he had been “intrusted by said defendant with the duty of keeping the ways,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. India Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Fitzgerald v. Connecticut River Paper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Davis Coal Co. v. PollandIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. O'Maley v. South Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Davis v. Mercer Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Laporte Carriage Co. v. SullenderIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Indianapolis & Greenfield Rapid Transit Co. v. ForemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API