Legal Opinion

Wardwell v. Paige

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Umatilla. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Watson, J.:

This suit was brought by the appellants in the circuit court for Umatilla county, to quiet their title to certain tracts of *518land situated in Umatilla city, in said county, and for a conveyance to them of any title appellants might have acquired therein. The circuit court rendered a deer pro forma, for the respondents, as it is understood, to facilitate an appeal and the final determination of the cause in this court.

Appellants claim through intermediate conveyances from Jesse S. Lurchin, who, they allege, obtained title to the premises, as a pre-emptor, under certain…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schulenberg v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Doll v. MeadorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Moran v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Taylor & Quarles v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  5. Arnold v. GrimesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Loney v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  2. McCarthy v. Coos Head Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Northern Pacific Railroad v. BarnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API